Monthly Archives: May 2012

Facebook – Next Area of Support Is EBV+5 or $18.22

I was speculating with a blog post (here) and Twitter, that Facebook would bounce off or hold at least for a while EBV+6 or $28.93.  As you can see from the intraday chart from Yahoo there was some support at this level, however this support level did not hold.

So what happens now?

Next support level is EBV+5 or $18.22.  I stated previously in my last blog on Facebook, I thought the odds were 50/50 that EBV+5 would be achieved.  After breaking EBV+6, those odds have increased significantly.

Facebook Model Price Chart

Facebook with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of FB subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

For those speculating with FB shares, this level $18.22 has to be a consideration when mapping out your trading strategy.  The good news about EBV+5 as support, it will be significant and should hold better than EBV+6.  This is based on my 15 years of working with EBV lines.

Yes, this also means more pain ahead for Facebook shareholders!

Anyone Noticing Today’s New High List?

My first love when reviewing the equity markets is to scan the 52-week new high low list. This list is always informative and tells you where the money is going. With the media focused on Facebook, and the endless stories, or should I say non-stories, of Europe the new high low list can hold some surprises.

Well today was such a day. Four Home Builder stocks made the new high list, M/I Homes (MHO), Mertiage Homes (MTH), NVR Inc. (NVR) and Toll Brothers (TOL). Here are the long-term charts of each from our Facebook app.

M/I Homes (MHO)

M/I Homes with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of MHO subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Meritage Homes (MTH)

Meritage Homes with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of MTH subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Toll Brothers (TOL)

Toll Brothers with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of TOL subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

All three of the above names, after hitting valuation highs in mid 2005, have been in a bear market for almost 7 years. This is obviously good news, not only for this sector, but also for the American economy as a whole.

The other surprises on the 52-week high list was Walmart (WMT) and Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY).

Wow, what is going on here?  One thought is that 3 or 4 years ago, an investor wanted international companies in your portfolio to leverage international growth (China) over US domestic companies with the US going into recession.  Now with Europe and a possible slowdown in China, and US domestic growth picking up relative to the rest of the world, equity money flows seem to be favouring US domestic companies.

What the Equity Market is saying about the US Money Center Banks?

J.P. Morgan (JPM), Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC) and Goldman Sachs (GS)

I wrote a blog post on these four back in January, (One of my first blogs) highlighting that all four were trading below EBV-3 and the possible reasons for this (here).  Since my blog post was written, J.P. Morgan (JPM) and Goldman (GS) came out of the blue, transited up through EBV-3.  I noted this and other financials transiting positively, which was a welcoming sign that economically speaking things were looking positively for these financial institutions and for the economy.

In the last weeks, every one of the highlighted financial institutions, JPM and GS, as well as other highlighted financials has reversed course and transited back under EBV-3.  Have assets on these banks’ balance sheets turned that quickly or is there a larger issue at work here?

One thought I did have, in the wake of JPM’s trading loss that Jamie Dimon announced, is that the market is now differentiating between money center – investment banks and retail branch banking banks.  Let’s look at a few examples.

J.P. Morgan’s (JPM) Model Price chart.

JP Morgan with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

Citigroup’s (C)  Model Price chart

Citigroup with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

Bank of America’s (BAC) Model Price chart

Bank of America with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

Goldman Sach’s (GS) Model Price chart

Goldman Sachs with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

In comparison let’s look at more retail orientated banks such as;

Wells Fargo (WFC)

Wells Fargo with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

Northern Trust (NTRS)

Northern Trust with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

US Bancorp (USB)

US Bancorp with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

PNC Financial Services Group (PNC)

PNC Financial Services with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

Some observations

1.  The money-center investment banks all trade at steep discounts to accounting book value.  The retail banks all trade around book or slightly above.  In the current environment let’s think about this for a second.  The investment banks have to deal with Dodd-Frank.  This piece of legislation, which has over two thousand pages of regulation on what, is “proprietary trading” and what isn’t.  Even with the recent well-publicized losses at JPM some say there is a question whether the trades were a hedge or directional trading.  Well guys the market has already decided, they will sell you at a discount because of this complexity.  And if the investment banks lose money the market will sell you off even more.

2.  The market currently likes retail banking.  Yes, dull and boring.  Utility like.  Not only do investors like the simplicity, it also likes the dividends.  Dull, boring retail banking.  The alpha dogs don’t like this business, but the market does!

3.  Too many conflicts in the investment banks.  Lloyd Blankfein said in a recent Bloomberg interview, that yes there were conflicts in his business however he sees no problem with this and that “they” can manage these conflicts when they arise.  My mouth dropped on my desk, first on the admission of conflicts (big admission that everybody now knows) and when I scooped my mouth off the desk, I chuckled about Goldman managing their own conflicts.

What Am I Saying?

Assuming asset quality is roughly the same in all the above noted financial institutions (big assumption but not huge) then the market seems to be discounting complexity, conflicts and exotic derivative trading and rewarding boring, process banking, simple to understand and dividend paying. 

If the CEO’s of JPM, C, BAC, and GS were to turn your back on hedge fund like trading, Dodd Frank, and intra-company conflicts the market, it seems, will reward you.  Here is a thought, pretend the Glass Seagall is alive and guide your company appropriately and the market will add billions to your market value.

How will we know this?

There could be some formal announcement or managements could quietly shift their business away from the complex areas listed above and invest in areas that WFC, NTRS, USB, and PNC are currently dominating.  Also, keep in mind the Federal Reserve can approve dividend increases and share buy backs if these financial institutions behave appropriately, as well.

Of course the market will know this, quicker than anybody else.  So we will again look for positive transits above EBV-3 and will notify you accordingly.

Beginning the 21st century, with the repeal of Glass Seagall, the market loved the concept of financial giants delivering financial services, from insurance, mutual funds and investment banking.  Twelve years later, and 20/20 hindsight, this has led the United States to the doorstep of financial ruin.  Also, we are living through the total overhaul of the US financial system since the great depression.  Interestingly, the market seems to be voting with market value where it wants this industry to head.  Dare I say Canadian Bank like!

Facebook, Strategy Session Post IPO. What Do You Do Now?

After Friday’s action on Facebook’s IPO, the press was merciless. Monday’s trading was probably predictable, but the question remains, “What do you do now?”

Well, let’s start with the model price chart.

Facebook with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of FB subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

You can see Friday’s price action on the noted price bar. You also can see, the close could not hold EBV+7 of $39.07.

What does the mean?

We are currently in the zone, where EBV+7 ($39.07) becomes resistance and EBV+6 ($28.98) becomes support. Where did these numbers come from? These numbers are based on our estimate of the pro forma balance sheet of Facebook post IPO. Fundamentals that are price specific, I know it’s hard to believe. Unfortunately technical analysis won’t help you in this case.

Some observations on my part.

1. Unlike any typical IPO, Facebook shares were being traded in a private marketplace. Bloomberg had been keeping track of these trades and price levels. We have included these price bars on our model price chart above. These trades were transacted at a higher price than the current market. (Monday’s Close $33.87). This suggests big supply, or overhand in the stock. This may take months to clear, depending on the holders of these private transactions. In other words, were the buyers hoping for a quick flip on the IPO or long-term holders of the position?

2. I believe everyone is “shocked” on the aftermarket of Facebook. This was supposed to be the bellwether. We, the public, have been hyped on Facebook since the movie “The Social Network”. To have this IPO fail is amazing. I would love to hear the behind the scene conversations on this. I’m sure there is finger pointing everywhere. Not to mention another piece of bad news for the investment banks. Morgan Stanley, lead underwriter, spent only a day supporting the stock price. Then what? Ran for the hills? J.P. Morgan, in the lead group, was it distracted trying to unwind some nefarious trades? (What is up with the investment banks anyhow? The market seems to be taking them apart. Future blog post)

3. Valuations on other social media will have to be scrutinized by investors. Shares like LinkedIn trade over EBV+8. If Facebook trades under EBV+7, LinkedIn should trade under $50 per share, if LinkedIn had the same valuation. And what about the lesser names like YELP, Groupon and Zenga. What about future social media IPO’s in general?

As I have written in the past I believe Facebook shares, under the price of $39 per share is good value for long-term investors. (Here)

So where does all this leave you?

Short-term I believe Facebook could fall to EBV+5, which is $18.25 per share. Again this is a probability. If investors are putting their hand out, catching the proverbial falling knife, or averaging down then you should know that Facebook could fall to this level. What is the probability? I would say 50/50.

Keep in mind Facebook will be in a quiet period by the SEC meaning Facebook cannot defend itself. Also, insiders’ can sell stock in 91 days after the IPO, which is called “lock up”. Yes, it seems that nothing but silence and more distribution will be facing investors short-term. Not to mention all the negative macro factors impacting the market on a daily basis – Europe.

So there you have it. Facebook was supposed to be a sure winner. Retail investors lined up in a market where they were cashing out of their equities. This event had turning point written all over it – both in terms of a bottom to this current correction and about the equity market in general. However Friday delivered bad news to all who participated – just what this market needed!

RIMM – Broke EBV-3, Is the Big Whoosh Coming?

Man, bottoms are hard!

I didn’t think RIMM would break EBV-3 and I have said so in many blogs.  However, today RIMM broke EBV-3.

Here is the Chart:

Research In Motion (US) with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of RIMM subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Now what?

Well this is the easiest part; wait until RIM breaks up through EBV-3 before you have any interest in this security.  Obviously a bottom could not form at EBV-3, though I believed RIMM tried to bottom around the $12 mark.  I guess there was too much overhang from holders at higher levels that supply of stock was too overwhelming.  If this is the true, then look for the big whoosh.

They kill everybody!  “Blood in the streets”

How far will RIMM go down?  Not sure.  RIMM has to find a level where everybody gives up.  “I have had enough and I can’t take it anymore.”

Then when all hope is lost.  When everyone forgets RIMM even existed.  Out of the ambers of that once raging bonfire maybe the stock will cross EBV-3.  Then you guessed it; RIMM will be “Coming out of the blue”.

Will be signing off on RIMM until this happens.
Man, bottoms are hard!  (But it’s when you make the most money!)

TCKB, TLM, PAA, SLW – Something’s Going On, More Deflation News Ahead?

Canadian cyclical companies have taken a beating in the last few weeks.  When markets are moving, especially downward as they have been, there is nothing like reviewing model price charts of bell weather stocks and the new 52 week low list to get a feel for what is going on.

Let’s look at a few companies and I will make comments on each.

Teck Cominco (TCKB)

Teck Cominco with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of TCKB subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Certainly TCKB can be considered a bell weather stock and I’m always fascinated on what TCKB is doing.  As you can see on our model price chart, TCKB has broken through EBV, which we calculate at $32.29.  We highlight TCKB, breaking EBV back in October.  Observe the weekly price bar of TCKB when the stock broke EBV back in October.  You can see the volatility, and the close for the week was half way through the zone.  This is typical of high profile stocks making a negative transit for the first time.  The second transit, which is just occurring, usually happens with a whimper.   Some would call it resignation or defeat.  THIS IS NOT A GOOD SIGN.  We would take this as a signal as lower prices for TCKB is ahead.

Remember no recommendation here, just a high probability event.

Talisman (TLM)

The last three weeks have not been kind to TLM.  What is significant to us is the negative transit through EBV.  The last time this occurred was back in 2008.  Keep in mind back in 2006 TLM was trading over EBV+5.  (That would place TLM close to $40 in today’s valuation dollars.)  The negative transit of EBV does suggest that TLM will see single digits for its’ stock price perhaps in the not so distant future.

Talisman with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of TLM subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Pan American Silver (PAA) and Silver Wheaton (SLW)

In a blog last week I highlighted three major gold producers, ABX, NEM, and GG.(here)  So, let’s highlight two silver companies Pan American Silver and Silver Wheaton.

Pan American Silver (PAA)

As you can see PAA, has broken EBV or $16.45.  Like the gold stocks, which I highlighted, the precious and semi-precious metals categories have been hard hit in recent weeks.  Certainly since the financial crises of 2008, money had poured into to hard asset categories including gold and silver securities, which gave these securities excessive valuations peaking at the end of 2011.  These excessive valuations are being reversed and these stocks, both gold and silver companies, are under distribution.

Pan American Silver with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of PAA subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Silver Wheaton (SLW)

Silver Wheaton broke EBV+5 couple of weeks ago.  SLW is very expensive, valuation at EBV+5, and potentially has a long way to fall.  Keep in mind SLW started its’ run in 2008 from EBV-2!  If SLW were to go back to EBV-2, looking at today’s balance sheet that would be a price of $5.81.  What I think is great about model price charts, is that, it gives investors perspective.   I’m I saying SLW will drop to $5.81, no.  I’m saying SLW traded at EBV-2 before, and it could happen again.  So if you are long the position, SLW has to transit through 6 EBV levels to get there.  This should help you manage the position if SLW were to get to EBV-2.

Silver Wheaton with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of SLW subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Conclusion

The market has been brutal to cyclical companies over the last few weeks.  I will highlight a few stocks each week that catch my eye, and that I want to expand on, especially if there is further erosion in the Canadian markets.

You have probably noticed that in the four situations that I have highlighted, model price was higher than where the stock was trading – sometimes materially so.  We see this a lot in cyclical companies.  Model price comes from analysts’ earnings estimates, and sometimes-fundamental analysts’ are slow to react to the changing market conditions or what is going on in the commodity markets.  As companies negative transit through EBV lines, the market is communicating well ahead of what the analysts’ will perhaps say down the road or what the company communicates to analysts’ about their future earning estimates.

The news isn’t all bad.  It is healthy to remember, today’s falling stock prices becomes tomorrow opportunities.  Keep watching these names and their respective model price charts for clues about trading strategies and or potential bottoms.

FB – Will Start to Trade on Friday, At What Price?

First, last night the underwriters’ have upped and tightened the range of the IPO price of Facebook.  The new range is $34 to $38 a share.  This puts the price of the IPO just under EBV+7.  Here is the chart.

Facebook with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of FB subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Just for fun, here is the chart of LinkedIn.  LinkedIn is the smaller cousin of Facebook and maybe interesting to look at in terms of valuation.

Here is the chart.

LinkedIn with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of LNKD subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

LinkedIn trades between EBV+8 and EBV+9.  If Facebook trades at the same valuation as LinkedIn, Facebook would trade at $88 per share.

Will be interesting to watch.

Other Facebook Blogs from ModelPriceGuy:

February 4, 2012 Facebook – At What Price Should You be a Buyer of the IPO?

February 9, 2012 Facebook – See Our Model Price Chart with Last Weeks Pricing

May 4, 2012 Facebook – At What Price Should You be a buyer of the IPO? (Update 1)

ABX, GG, and NEM – What is happening to the Gold stocks?

Back in the day, say 10 years ago, trading patterns in the gold shares where used to define macro predictions of future events.  Price signals mattered to a whole group of investors who forecasted increasing inflation, deflation, and direction of interest rates based on share price movements of gold shares. Granted any predictions were based on the use of regression analysis.  I have personally seen regression analysis on the price index of the TSX gold index, going back some 30 to 40 years having a near perfect correlation with interest rates.  I say, near perfect, because over the last 5 years with the increase in gold company shares, interest rates have decreased (significantly) instead of increasing.

It’s hard to have a discussion of this group (gold shares), without at least acknowledging the GLD.  Because of financial engineering, an ETF (exchange traded fund) was designed so investors could have a direct play in the price of gold bullion without the operational risk with may occur when buying shares of a gold mining company.

So the question of the day is whether the  collective fall in price of gold share companies actually mean anything in a macro context.  Specifically, are gold shares forecasting deflation ahead for the US and perhaps the world economy?  Or, with the invention of the GLD, gold mining shares are just operating companies with little to no predictive power.

I have pondering this question for sometime, with no real answer.  This is why I love the model price charts, because price signals weighted against model price and our Economic Book Values can give some clues about the future price action.

Look at three gold mining companies and see what our model price charts are telling us.

Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX)

Here is our chart.

Barrick Gold with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of ABX subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

EBV+2 is an important price point for ABX.  EBV +2 is $37.84US.  Certainly if ABX broke EBV+2, I think EBV would be a realistic price target ($26.07).  We have financial data on ABX going back 17 years.  ABX has only traded once at EBV, which occurred in the crash of 2008.

Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM)

Here is our chart.

Newmont Mining with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of NEM subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

EBV+2 is an important price point for NEM.  EBV+2 is $41.76US.  Same as ABX, if NEM broke EBV+2, I think EBV would be a realistic price target ($28.77).  Reviewing our financial data going back 17 years, NEM has never traded at EBV.

Please remember these are NOT predictions.  These are “what if’s” and probability.  Why invest in something unless you have a strategy or a plan?  That’s why model price charts can help with the “what if’s” questions.

GoldCorp Inc. (GG)

Here is the chart.

GoldCorp with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of GG subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

As you can see, GG has already broken EBV+2 or $39.84US.  I believe the probability is quite high that GG will trade at EBV sometime in the future.  Timing as always is everything – however we at least know the direction.  In the crash of 2008, GG traded as low as EBV-2 or $18.80US, using the March 31, 2012 balance sheet.

Conclusion

Are falling gold mining shares telling anything about our economic future?  History is always easier looking backwards.  Maybe gold shares are telling us something, maybe not.

Certainly with ABX and NEM, important support will be tested in terms of EBV+2.  If these two giants break EBV+2 then lower prices seem highly probable.  Maybe gold shares will be getting so inexpensive, that mining gold on Wall Street (in terms of M&A activity) will be more profitable than mining gold in the ground.

Like everything else in this market, this subject will be interesting to observe.

I’m on Market Call!

Friday, May 18, 2012, Market Call on BNN (Canadian Business Show) 1:30 pm – 2:00 pm (eastern standard).

Canadian Pacific – Update Number 4

Our last post on Canadian Pacific was on March 1, so we thought we check in on CP in terms of our model price chart.

First let’s look at the Model Price Chart as at March 1, blog.

Canadian Pacific with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

Here is the updated Model Price Chart as of last night:

Canadian Pacific with weekly price bars, EBV Lines (colored lines) and model price (dashed line)

For those interested, a daily updated chart of CP subsequent to this post will be maintained on Facebook, here.

Here is what we wrote on March 1, blog:

As we can see from the chart nothing much has happened in terms of price.  What is interesting is where the market price of CP has come to rest.  The market price of CP is using EBV+4 as support.  This will probably be the case up until the shareholder vote on May 17, 2012.  Remember EBV lines are calculated from the balance sheet.  Also, note the volatility of the market price.  When market prices on stocks, in general, use EBV lines for support stock volatility drops substantially.

So, May 17 is just around the corner and it looks like Ackman will win his proxy fight.  This will be a large rebuff to the Canadian business establishment.  As we wrote in our first blog about the company, Canadian Pacific is an underperforming outlier compared to the rest of the industry and in need of a shake-up.

In terms of price performance, as the reader can see on the above Model Price chart, CP is fully priced at these levels.  Other than the change of actors on the board, and Hunter Harrison back as CEO, we wouldn’t expect any large improvement in the share price anytime soon.  However a dip in the stock price back to EBV+3 would be an interesting situation for investors we would predict.

Other posts

Canadian Pacific – Update Number 3

Canadian Pacific – Time to let the stock go?

Canadian Pacific – Ackman wanting to shake up CP, Why?